The uniform worn by schoolchildren has a brief and somewhat turbulent background. Practically speaking uniforms for school in the present are rooted in an earlier British schools that were part of the public system. To make things clearer the term “British public school” refers to an British state school (public) is comparable with one of the American private school, while the equivalent of an American state-run public school would be comparable to the equivalent of a British State school.
From the beginning to the middle into the nineteenth century British private schools were the domain of a wealthy class and the aristocratic mandarins who remained in the British Empire. However, they were incredibly unruly, with students doing according to their wishes. The uniform was introduced to instill an increased degree of cohesion and discipline and soon gained acceptance within the system of public schools. It is remarkable that many of these uniforms remain largely unchanged to this day.
As is the norm in the middle classes, those who traditionally been able to send their children into more exclusive, yet privately-funded schools began to adopt the look for uniforms at school that were worn by their former social peers. In 1870 the Education Act made schooling for everyone in Britain and many of the newly established state schools subsequently took on the uniforms that had been widely adopted within the privately-funded system.From the time of the Act, up to the 1960’s, uniforms were almost all-inclusive in Britain. United Kingdom.
The American experience offers an contrast. The uniform for school (except those in Catholic and parochial school) was not widely known. A lot of schools had dress codes that were more ad hoc than prescriptive. High heels and blue jeans are a good example. High heels, for instance, could be prohibited, but students were not instructed on what they were required to wear.
This is precisely the kind of method that our advocate for school uniforms claimed to have established in her school in South Houston in the late 1950’s. she attributes a significant increase in discipline and in grades.
In 1996 In 1996, in 1996, President Clinton gave the Secretary of Education Richard W Riley to send the Manual on School Uniforms to all School Districts across the United States. The manual outlined the Government’s policy, and provided guidelines for all schools , on which they could base the requirements for uniforms. The Government’s position was that the introduction of uniforms for school would lessen school violence and apathy however, they did not make uniforms mandatory, with the choice being left to school districts.The views of the government wasn’t accepted by the parents, students and school district administrators. In 1998, just 11 demon slayer shoes percent of Public Elementary Schools had adopted uniform policies, and in 2000, that number was only up to 15.5%.The decision to introduce uniforms did not reflect the same view across the nation. Schools in the suburbs had a less pronounced rate of adoption possibly due to an effort by a politically polarized group of parents.
The sides of the debate on school are prone to having nearly polarized opinions and there’s an abundance of data and counter-statistics that can support either side of the argument.